 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsAustralia and NZCanadaUSAUSA Marriage Base ImmigrationKB.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Immigration Forum / Australia and NZ / November 2007Australia's New Order
Australia's New Order Taking a cautious step to the left, voters end more than a decade of conservative rule to elect a Labor government. by Elizabeth Keenan http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1687361,00.html A good article, should be interesting to readers interested in more details on the election. Cheers, Kangaroo16 > Australia's New Order > > Taking a cautious step to the left, voters end more than a decade > of conservative rule to elect a Labor government. And this is relevant to this newsgroup how????? On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:42:18 -0800 (PST), kangaroo16a@gmail.com wrote in <85de2b71-aed5-4963-815b-d333fde793c8@a35g2000prf.googlegroups.com> >> Australia's New Order >> >> Taking a cautious step to the left, voters end more than a decade >> of conservative rule to elect a Labor government. > >And this is relevant to this newsgroup how????? And, as wrote in reply to previous post, why are you so reluctant to identify yourself? Believe it or not, I don't reply to my own posts. :-) Refusal of identification is getting a bit desperate, yes? I, for one, am interested in your motives for doing so. Others may or may not be interested. Cheers, Kangaroo16 > On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:42:18 -0800 (PST), kangaroo...@gmail.com > wrote in [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > And, as wrote in reply to previous post, why are you so reluctant > to identify yourself? I refuse to identify myself? Firstly, I have a valid email address. Is yours - of course not! Going through your previous postings, I note that you have not always used the sig kangaroo16 but other sigs. Perhaps you should take a look in/at your own back yard first before you start accusing others of forgery. > Believe it or not, I don't reply to my own posts. :-) So says you. > Refusal of identification is getting a bit desperate, yes? Pray tell me where in this newsgroups Rules, does it say that one ***must*** identify oneself? If there is such a Rule, why is it that you have not only failed to identiy *yourself* but use a fake email address as well! > I, for one, am interested in your motives for doing so. Others > may or may not be interested. Motives? Does there have to be one [or more]? Check your own previous postings about 'Freedom of Speech' before you say another word! > Cheers, > Kangaroo16 Killing two birds with one stone so to speak: From your next posting for reasons only known to yourself why you had to write your comments in two postings [other than loving seeing yourself in print perhaps], you wrote: >Getting a bit desperate when you attempt to forge my posting >name, are you? >Oh well, will leave this for other readers to decide :-) When have I 'forged' your name? Freedom of Speech remember! >Cheers, anyway, and you seem to need some cheering up if >you are unwilling to even give me a pseudonym to reply to. :-) You are most welcome to email me privately as the email address used here, is valid i.e. an email will reach me. >I would assume that most members of this group could detect y>our >attempts at misleading readers. Attempts at misleading? You are crazier than I first though when reading your posts. By the way, your miserable attempts at projecting to others that you are some sort of medical professional fall flat with me. The only knowledge you have is your own treatment for being crazy is it not? >I admit that I am interested in your motives for doing so.:-) >Cheers, >Kangaroo16 Since when did you appoint yourself Moderator of this newsgroup? Ok you want me to use a 'nic, simple I will just use part of my email address like you do.. kangaroo16a On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:42:18 -0800 (PST), kangaroo16a@gmail.com wrote in <85de2b71-aed5-4963-815b-d333fde793c8@a35g2000prf.googlegroups.com> >> Australia's New Order >> >> Taking a cautious step to the left, voters end more than a decade >> of conservative rule to elect a Labor government. > >And this is relevant to this newsgroup how????? Getting a bit desperate when you attempt to forge my posting name, are you? Oh well, will leave this for other readers to decide :-) Cheers, anyway, and you seem to need some cheering up if you are unwilling to even give me a pseudonym to reply to. :-) I would assume that most members of this group could detect your attempts at misleading readers. I admit that I am interested in your motives for doing so.:-) Cheers, Kangaroo16 |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.