
Signature
I'm not an attorney. This disclaimer is valid in NYS!
> Renew by sending in new applications. Check where and how you are to
> file. If your district is part of the Phase I then it goes to the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> A/P for pending AOS and re-entry permit for Permanent Resident who
> will be outside of the US for more than a year up to two years.
Thanks a lot!
>>I'm trying to renew I765 and I131 as I await adjustment of status to
>>permanent resident (I485).
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> A/P for pending AOS and re-enter for Permanent Resident.
As Rete has noted, you need to submit a new application for the renewal.
Not an issue that the previous has expired; each application is
evaluated on its own merits. That you previously had an EAD or A/P
doesn't automatically entitle you to renewal; you still have to meet the
regulatory requirements.
It's actually "advance authorization of parole." Works like this.
Parole = physical admission at the border with the understanding that
the person has not been "admitted' under the law. Legally, the person
is outside of the U.S.; physically, inside. This has consequences in
terms of the government's burden of proof in removal proceedings.
Parole may be applied for at the border. It's what might happen, for
example, if you were ineligible for admission but needed emergency
medical attention, or if there were other humanitarian concerns. This
is the typical way someone would be paroled into the U.S.
In the case of a pending adjustment applicant, you can ask for sort of
an advisory opinion which says, if you leave the U.S. and come back, you
will be paroled into the U.S. if you apply, assuming you haven't done
anything in the meantime to disqualify yourself. This is the "advance"
part. The agency is authorizing your parole into the U.S. in advance of
when you actually apply for it. (In this case, the application is just
showing up at the border and asking to be let in.)
Note, because someone who enters with advance parole authorization is a
parolee, that person is physically in the U.S. but legally outside, just
as if the parole had been applied for first at the border. For most
pending adjustment applicants, this is just a technical difference
because the risk of being placed in removal proceedings is small. But,
in any individual case, if there is a risk of being placed in removal
proceedings, the person may not wish to apply for parole and give up the
additional rights that he or she may have as an admitted alien (assuming
he or she was inspected upon admission).
Bottom line, if your case is simple and clearly approvable, advance
parole is nothing to worry about; if there are any irregularities,
consult a lawyer before traveling on advance parole.

Signature
Above intended as general commentary, not specific legal
advice. Your mileage may vary.
===============================================================
Jonathan McNeil Wong Voice: 510-451-0544
Donahue, Gallagher Woods LLP Facsimile: 510-832-1486
P.O. Box 12979 http://www.donahue.com
Oakland, CA 94604-2979 E-mail: jonathan@donahue.com
===============================================================
Kirstysutton - 30 Jan 2005 19:42 GMT
> >>I'm trying to renew I765 and I131 as I await adjustment of status to
> >>permanent resident (I485).
[quoted text clipped - 82 lines]
> jonathan@donahue.com
> ===============================================================
Thanks for the help.
Just one more question, for now:
I'm struggling to figure out how to answer two questions on the
I765 form.
If I have a I485 pending based on marriage to a US Citizen last entered
the country on Advance Parole based on AOS.
So, to answer the question, "what was the manner of last entry", do I
check "Parolee" or K3 (married to USC) or something else? I don't see K
used anywhere on the docs supplied by the lawyer who handled the
applications.
And how to answer the question "Current Immigration Status"? Is that K3?
THANKS
Folinskyinla - 30 Jan 2005 20:44 GMT
> Thanks for the help.
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> THANKS
Hi:
Just to be pedantic -- a "parole" is not an "entry," it is a "parole."
So, with that in mind, its easy to figure out. However, even if you put
in "parole" -- it is a "no harm, no foul" situation. [RIP, Chick. It
hasn't been the same since you left us].
"The trouble is all inside your head she said to me. The answer is easy
if you take it logically. I'd like to help you in your struggle to be
free." Paul Simon

Signature
Certified Specialist
Immigration & Nat. Law
Cal. Bar Board of Legal Specialization
Kirstysutton - 30 Jan 2005 20:56 GMT
> Hi:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> easy if you take it logically. I'd like to help you in your struggle
> to be free." Paul Simon
THANKS.
Here's what I'm still not quite following:
a) if being a "parolee" is not a method of entry, why would it be listed
as a method of entry? Not that the people creating codes for USCIS
are necessarily logicians, but surely it has to be an acceptable
method of entry or it would not be listed?
b) if you had to make a partially educated guess as to my manner of last
entry given that I had an L1 visa, got married, applied for I485,
I765 and I131, and entered last using the I131 approval showing that
I entered on AP with "purpose" listed as AOS, what you you say the
manner of last entry was? I'm guessing, so your more knowledgable
guess can only help.
c) same question for my current immigration status. I think that I am
awaiting AOS to PR based on having filed I485. But that's not an
option. What do you think?
I'd love to get these forms just right as paying the fees twice or
having the forms enter some kind of bureaucratic no-mans-land marked
"stupid applicant not worthy of US residency" are not very palatable.
THANKS A LOT
Folinskyinla - 31 Jan 2005 16:06 GMT
> THANKS.
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> THANKS A LOT
Hi:
To repeat, "no harm, no foul." Lot of the CIS forms are like this --
they will use "terms of art" when they mean it in an everday sense.
The term "child" is very tightly defined in the Immigration &
Nationality Act and the I-130 form and the instructions mess this up
quite badly. Without going into details, if you were to ask me "How
many children do you have?" I could answer either "two" or "none" and
both would be correct.
The term "entry" is long defined "term of art" in the Immigration Laws.
To exacerbate problems, the 1996 amendments removed the defintion and
replaced it with the term "admission" while still using the term "entry"
in other parts of the Act. It DOES get confusing at times.
As I said, "no harm, no foul" -- don't lose sleep over that one.

Signature
Certified Specialist
Immigration & Nat. Law
Cal. Bar Board of Legal Specialization
Jonathan McNeil Wong - 31 Jan 2005 05:57 GMT
> <Snip>
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> if you take it logically. I'd like to help you in your struggle to be
> free." Paul Simon
Right you are; it is not an entry for immigration purposes, which
explains why it made such a difference when Jimmy Carter declared all of
those Haitians "entrants."
But, it is an entry in the physical sense, as opposed to in the legal sense.

Signature
Above intended as general commentary, not specific legal
advice. Your mileage may vary.
===============================================================
Jonathan McNeil Wong Voice: 510-451-0544
Donahue, Gallagher Woods LLP Facsimile: 510-832-1486
P.O. Box 12979 http://www.donahue.com
Oakland, CA 94604-2979 E-mail: jonathan@donahue.com
===============================================================
ian-mstm - 31 Jan 2005 13:46 GMT
> Hi:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> easy if you take it logically. I'd like to help you in your struggle
> to be free." Paul Simon
This sounds a bit... well... like Douglas Adams to me - I mean, that's
how Arthur Dent can have tea and not-tea at the same time! :) Y'know,
the more I think about it, USCIS is like the Hitchhiker's Guide in
many ways!
Ian
Folinskyinla - 31 Jan 2005 16:09 GMT
> This sounds a bit... well... like Douglas Adams to me - I mean, that's
> how Arthur Dent can have tea and not-tea at the same time! :) Y'know,
> the more I think about it, USCIS is like the Hitchhiker's Guide in
> many ways!
>
> Ian
Hey Ian:
I am in TOTAL agreement. I really enjoyed the five books of the
"Hitchhiker's" Trilogy
I sometimes wonder if Doug Adams ever worked as a legislative drafter
for some Congressman back in the 50's.

Signature
Certified Specialist
Immigration & Nat. Law
Cal. Bar Board of Legal Specialization
> Renew by sending in new applications. Check where and how you are to
> file. If your district is part of the Phase I then it goes to the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> A/P for pending AOS and re-entry permit for Permanent Resident who
> will be outside of the US for more than a year up to two years.
Hey Rete:
BTW, the I-551 alien card is a "rentry permit" for absenses of less than
a year. That definition is in the passport. However, the term is most
commonly used for the book form applied for by use of the I-131. As
discussed elsewhere, many people call that little turquoise book the
"White Passport."

Signature
Certified Specialist
Immigration & Nat. Law
Cal. Bar Board of Legal Specialization