my wife wants us to spilt the bills and she has a saving account in her
name and not in mine , but the checking account has her name on it and
my saving account has her and mine name on it
Ray - 30 Jan 2005 04:02 GMT
> my wife wants us to spilt the bills and she has a saving account in
> her name and not in mine , but the checking account has her name on it
> and my saving account has her and mine name on it
No great problem there my wife has accounts still in her name from long
before she met me ..it never came up...If your everyday checking account
is in both names ..thats good...
Noorah101 - 30 Jan 2005 04:14 GMT
> No great problem there my wife has accounts still in her name from
> long before she met me ..it never came up...If your everyday checking
> account is in both names ..thats good...
I don't think it should hurt you. The way you run your finances is your
own business.
My husband and I split the bills too. We have 2 checking accounts with
both our names on them - one for him to use for his purposes and one for
my purposes and bills are split between those 2 accounts. Works for us
just fine!
Rene
inquisitive40 - 30 Jan 2005 06:14 GMT
> my wife wants us to spilt the bills and she has a saving account in
> her name and not in mine , but the checking account has her name on it
> and my saving account has her and mine name on it
Just show accounts in both your names, the interviewer is unlikely to
ask for ALL accounts, they just want evidence of a bona fide
relationship,,,, I know people with seperate phone lines and bank
accounts. a few utility bills, joint bank statements etc should be fine.
Patrick

Signature
inquisitive40
Rete - 30 Jan 2005 20:56 GMT
> my wife wants us to spilt the bills and she has a saving account in
> her name and not in mine , but the checking account has her name on it
> and my saving account has her and mine name on it
Hurt you with who? Did your wife already adjust status? And even if
she did not what is the issue?
You are a fool if you don't take her name off your savings account.
That is my opinion. It looks like her money is hers and your money is
hers. You can put my name on there as well if you are giving it away
;-) I also have two retirement accounts. My daughters are beneficiary
to one and my husband to the other. I do not feel that he is entitled
to earnings I had been able to squirrel away for 25 years before I met
him. And he feels the same for his RRSP in Canada. His son is
beneficiary to that.
In our household we have a joint checking account and two very separate
savings accounts. I do not have access to his and he does not have
access to mine. It didn't bother INS/USCIS. Why should it?
It is all a matter of private dealings between husband and wife and has
no bearing on your wife's immigration processing as long as you can show
that you have shared financial accounts. That would be your checking
account and your tax filings.

Signature
I'm not an attorney. This disclaimer is valid in NYS!
Noorah101 - 31 Jan 2005 11:03 GMT
> Hurt you with who? Did your wife already adjust status? And even if
> she did not what is the issue?
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> can show that you have shared financial accounts. That would be your
> checking account and your tax filings.
It might be beneficial for his wife to have immediate access to any
savings in the event he suddenly dies, and she needs immediate funds to
live on. If they don't have grown children (or have irresponsible
ones), it might be a problem for her to quickly draw out cash to pay for
immediate needs if she doesn't have her own income. It takes a while to
get any insurance money, and in the meantime, she would have to survive.
I think him putting her on his savings account makes perfect sense.
I do agree that it's a private issue between them and it won't matter to
USCIS. But I don't think he's a fool.
Rene
Rete - 31 Jan 2005 14:11 GMT
> It might be beneficial for his wife to have immediate access to any
> savings in the event he suddenly dies, and she needs immediate funds
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Rene
Actually that is and should not be an issue. If they have a joint
checking account that means they both of Debit Cards. If she has his
password (I know Jim's and Jim knows mine) all she needs to do is access
his account to withdraw a few hundred. I would assume your advice would
pertain to the wife's savings account as well. Should not the husband
have immediate access to that one since she would have immediate access
to his? And if that is the case, have you not eliminated the issue of
independence and privacy by making all accounts joint?
I was speaking more of a couple who both work, both bring in money and
both have their own savings account with one checking account. I don't
see where the issue would be on complete separateness for the savings
account. After death it doesn't take all that long to access the
spouse's funds if the wife is listed as beneficiary to the account.
Sorry if I put anyone off with my opinions, but I do hold firm that
every couple should an "us", "mine" and "their" accounts. Marriage is
nice but still one should hold on to some financial independence if only
to have an account to buy a gift for the other without having to
withdraw from the household accounts.
Just as any property I owned before marriage would never become joint
property unless the new spouse were to either fork over 1/2 of the house
value. If it were property I bought and sweated for prior to marriage,
then that property is not joint and would be protected by a pre-nup to
that effect. Remember I'm a product of the 60's and 70's; not the 50's
June Cleaver role model ;-) Nothing wrong with June but I prefer to
have a marriage where emotions are shared but that financially I have
retained a semblence of independence and financial stability.

Signature
I'm not an attorney. This disclaimer is valid in NYS!