 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsAustralia and NZCanadaUSAUSA Marriage Base ImmigrationKB.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Immigration Forum / USA Marriage Base / August 2003Sec 245(i)?
Note to U.S. Citizens: If your foreign national spouse entered the U.S. illegally (without a visa or visa waiver), you should wait to apply for adjustment of status when Sec 245(i) is extended. Check back here periodically for updates. Could someone explain this to me?. Originally posted by SlantedAArdvark > Note to U.S. Citizens: If your foreign national spouse entered the > U.S. illegally (without a visa or visa waiver), you should wait to > apply for adjustment of status when Sec 245(i) is extended. Check back > here periodically for updates. > Could someone explain this to me?. Hi: Any competent immigration attorney will be able to explain it. -- Certified Specialist Immigration & Nat. Law Cal. Bar Board of Legal Specialization > Note to U.S. Citizens: If your foreign national spouse entered the U.S. > illegally (without a visa or visa waiver), you should wait to apply for > adjustment of status when Sec 245(i) is extended. Check back here > periodically for updates. > > Could someone explain this to me?. It means you will be waiting a long time as there have been no signs of this happening any time soon. Do you see trolls in your sleep also......??? Looks like a perfectly good question to me. Wish I new the answer but I dont.. Small men like to put others down to boost themselves up > > Note to U.S. Citizens: If your foreign national spouse entered the U.S. > > illegally (without a visa or visa waiver), you should wait to apply for [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > It means you will be waiting a long time as there have been no signs of > this happening any time soon. > Do you see trolls in your sleep also......??? > Looks like a perfectly good question to me. Wish I new the answer but I > dont.. > > Small men like to put others down to boost themselves up What in the world are you talking about?? I answered the question. An amnesty for illegal immigrants is nowhare in sight. Am I doing something wrong by stating the facts? There is NO amnesty in sight. Would you rather I told him to wait in the US as there was bound to be one soon? Am I putting someone down because I don't want them to have false hope? Where do you see me putting someone down?? My original response is below. I stand by my original response. I said: ************************************************************************* It means you will be waiting a long time as there have been no signs of > this happening any time soon. ********************************************************************** Originally posted by Mrtravel > > Do you see trolls in your sleep also......??? > > Looks like a perfectly good question to me. Wish I new the > answer but I > > dont.. > > Small men like to put others down to boost themselves up > What in the world are you talking about?? > I answered the question. > An amnesty for illegal immigrants is nowhare in sight. > Am I doing something wrong by stating the facts? > There is NO amnesty in sight. Would you rather I told him to > wait in the > US as there was bound to be one soon? Am I putting someone > down because > I don't want them to have false hope? > Where do you see me putting someone down?? My original response > is below. > I stand by my original response. > I said: > *****************************************************************- > ******** > It means you will be waiting a long time as there have been no > signs of > > this happening any time soon. > ********************************************************************** Hi: You hit a pet peeve of mine -- 245(i) has been unfairly tagged as an "amnesty" -- it was no such thing. It was enacted as simply a procedural change for budgetary reasons back in 1994. Before September 1994, you became eligible for a visa, but were ineligable for adjustment -- you simply went abroad and consular processed. In fact, it was often easier and quicker than adjustment to do that. However, in 1996, the 3/10 year bars were added to the law. So 245(i) took on a substantive meaning. There is debate going on now that the current law has the effect of creating an underground class which is not a good thing. Thee is a possiblity that 212(a)(9) might be modified in someway so that "illegals" have to leave in order to get a green card. If they are denied, then the government has no need to deport them. -- Certified Specialist Immigration & Nat. Law Cal. Bar Board of Legal Specialization Originally posted by Folinskyinla > Hi: > You hit a pet peeve of mine -- 245(i) has been unfairly tagged as an > "amnesty" -- it was no such thing. It was enacted as simply a > procedural change for budgetary reasons back in 1994. > Before September 1994, you became eligible for a visa, but were > ineligable for adjustment -- you simply went abroad and consular > processed. In fact, it was often easier and quicker than adjustment > to do that. > However, in 1996, the 3/10 year bars were added to the law. So 245(i) > took on a substantive meaning. > There is debate going on now that the current law has the effect of > creating an underground class which is not a good thing. Thee is a > possiblity that 212(a)(9) might be modified in someway so that > "illegals" have to leave in order to get a green card. If they are > denied, then the government has no need to deport them. Sounds good to me. > Do you see trolls in your sleep also......??? > Looks like a perfectly good question to me. Wish I new the answer but I > dont.. > > Small men like to put others down to boost themselves up To followup my last post! Maybe you need to read what I have said. What trolls. I have responded to at least 3 recent questions from this same person. Here are short versions of the questions and answers 1. 125 percent of poverty level? answer. I posted the official BCIS doc link for I-864P 2. Previous marriages a problem? answer. Not usually, but watch out for Mumbai 3. 245(i) extension answer... You will be waiting a long time for this to happen. So please, Raul, tell me what the hell you are talking about and please tell me why my response to question 3 makes me a "small" man? Am I not being helpful in answering the questions as honestly as I can? Originally posted by Raul > Do you see trolls in your sleep also......??? > Looks like a perfectly good question to me. Wish I new the > answer but I > dont.. > Small men like to put others down to boost themselves up Why do you wish you knew the answer? Did your foreign spouse enter the US without a visa or visa waiver? Just what kind of entry would that constitute? In other words, in what other way would s/he enter the US? And before anyone asks, I already answered SA's question about this in another thread. thats okay slanted, I'm surprised they didnt accuse you of being Seadave. lol. So far they have accused about two dozen names of being him. ROFLMAO. talk about paranoia. course they are not done with you yet. keep asking questions and posting and the sharks will attack > Do you see trolls in your sleep also......??? > Looks like a perfectly good question to me. Wish I new the answer but I [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > It means you will be waiting a long time as there have been no signs of > > this happening any time soon. I was referring to the post above that said this was another troll and to ignore it. I wasnt not referring to your post Mr. Travel.Thank you for answering the question. God Forbid Mr. Pink were to work for 911. "sorry maam we cant dispatch a police officer you sound like a troll and we will ignore you" > > Note to U.S. Citizens: If your foreign national spouse entered the U.S. > > illegally (without a visa or visa waiver), you should wait to apply for [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > It means you will be waiting a long time as there have been no signs of > this happening any time soon. I would refer you to a thread here called "o/t - driven to cynicism". This may put my comment in some kind of context. > I was referring to the post above that said this was another troll and to > ignore it. I wasnt not referring to your post Mr. Travel.Thank you for > answering the question. God Forbid Mr. Pink were to work for 911. "sorry > maam we cant dispatch a police officer you sound like a troll and we will > ignore you" The only posts you quoted in my response was the original post and my post. If are going to say bad things about someone, at least include the post you are referring to. >> I was referring to the post above that said this was another troll and to >> ignore it. I wasnt not referring to your post Mr. Travel.Thank you for [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > post. If are going to say bad things about someone, at least include the > post you are referring to. I meant "the only posts you quoted in YOUR response" Save your breath, this is our troll back with a new name. Ignore. Mr Pink ~and SecretGarden ~~Houston we have a problem I guess its my fault people think im a troll, im just a little "abstract". I'm looking into ways to stay with my girlfriend in the US while she has our baby.... I was just asking about the 245(i) thing cause im investigating every angle and it intriguid me. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.