> Not really, no. They look at the latest tax return (only 1 year
> required now, not 3), but they go by your current income to see if you
> meet the minimum income requirement.
>
> Best Wishes,
> Rene
Child support is for the support of the child, not you or the immigarnt
that you sponsoring.
So yes you could claim it but no it would not be taken into account.
If you are that close you need a co-sponsor.
Hardworking4u - 16 Feb 2006 13:54 GMT
> Child support is for the support of the child, not you or the
> immigarnt that you sponsoring.
>
> So yes you could claim it but no it would not be taken into account.
>
> If you are that close you need a co-sponsor.
So if i understand this correctly:
1. If its me, my spouce and 2 kids then the sponcer should make atleast
24187$ per year.
2. I heard now you only have to show 1 years taxes and not 3 . The
sponcer has already filed there tax for this year. Is this all they
will need to show for the I-864? Or will they have to show the taxes
that they filed last year?
Boiler - 16 Feb 2006 15:28 GMT
> So if i understand this correctly:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> will need to show for the I-864? Or will they have to show the
> taxes that they filed last year?
1. If that is the 125% of the 2006 Poverty guidelines - yes. Note it is
the 'family' size that counts.
2. Latest taxes, so if they have filed for last year, that is the one.
The 3 year requirement is still it appears used at a some Consuls, but
it is not that you have exceeded the minimum, just that you have filed
for 3 years. Both a Sponsor and any Co-Sponsor needs to have filed.
JEff - 28 Feb 2006 23:10 GMT
Boiler,
Why wouldn't the 3-year tax return requirement still be used, at all
consulates?
The new USCIS I-864 policy memorandum applies to the USCIS adjudication
of AOS applications, not to DoS adjudication of visa applications.
Regards, JEff
> ....
>
> The 3 year requirement is still it appears used at a some Consuls, but
> it is not that you have exceeded the minimum, just that you have filed
> for 3 years. Both a Sponsor and any Co-Sponsor needs to have filed.
jeffreyhy - 16 Feb 2006 14:35 GMT
> Child support is for the support of the child, not you or the
> immigarnt that you sponsoring.
>
> So yes you could claim it but no it would not be taken into account.
>
> If you are that close you need a co-sponsor.
Boiler,
Interesting issue.
The premise of I-864 is that Household Income be adequate to support the
Household Size. The child has income, in the form of support payments
coming from their other parent. This would reasonably offset the amount
of support required from the Household Member parent.
Can a child enter into an I-186A agreement with their parent? (I
doubt it.)
Regards, JEff

Signature
Of course, the Internet also tells us that hot naked women want to
befriend us, so we can't be 100% sure about everything we read there.
(Dave Barry)
Hardworking4u - 17 Feb 2006 14:08 GMT
> Boiler,
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Regards, JEff
I dont see how child support payments cannot be used as income.
Understable that it is for the child but its not written TO the child
its written to the parent/guardian. A greater portion of both parents
income goes towards the child regardless is that to say that that should
be deducted from the 125% guideline? I seriously doubt it.
But then again i'm not a lawyer.