Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsAustralia and NZCanadaUSAUSA Marriage Base
ImmigrationKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Immigration Forum / USA Marriage Base / September 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Help!  International Marriage in Brazil

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mark - 23 Sep 2006 20:42 GMT
I have been dating my girlfriend for many years and have decieded to ask her to marry me - which thankfully she agreed.  She lives in Brazil, I an a US resident.  

We are planning to get married in Brazil, and then file I-130, once it is approved then file 1-129F (the same form that is used for the Fiancée K-1 visa, but in this case for a Temporary Spouse K-3 visa)  With the approved I-129F, my then wife obtains the temporary visa to enter the US, and then we apply for permanent residence.

My cousel said it could take about 5 months for this to get approved.  But I heard today that sometimes it can be years!  YIKES

We have already planned a big wedding of about 150 people in March 2006 in Brazil.  But I would hate to have to be stuck in red tape over the course of years to have her come to the States.

Any advice, or help would be greatfully appreciated and/or tips.  I was told I should also save all the letters and correspondence over the time we have known other.  Please help.
Noorah101 - 23 Sep 2006 22:00 GMT
> I have been dating my girlfriend for many years and have decieded to
> ask her to marry me - which thankfully she agreed.  She lives in
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via
> Encryption =----

Hi Mark,

You don't need to have an *approved* I-130 in order to file the I-129F
for the K-3.  You just need to have the *receipt* (the NOA) from the I-
130, to include with the I-129F package.  That makes a big difference.

I don't know how fast Brazil's process is, but in general, the I-130's
have sped up quite a bit recently, so you may end up having that get
processed even before the I-129F.

As far as how long the whole thing takes, it's anyone's guess.  But
really you have no choice, once you marry you just have to wait as long
as it takes.  You should mentally prepare yourselves in case it does
take a year.

Best Wishes,
Rene
Jenney & Mark - 23 Sep 2006 22:03 GMT
> I have been dating my girlfriend for many years and have decieded to
> ask her to marry me - which thankfully she agreed.  She lives in
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via
> Encryption =----

I'm not sure why your attorney told you it would take only a few months.
Since you're only a permanent resident, it will take a LONG time, aka
years. You might want to wait until you are able to naturalize before
going down this path. How long would that take?

~ Jenney
Noorah101 - 23 Sep 2006 22:07 GMT
> I'm not sure why your attorney told you it would take only a few
> months. Since you're only a permanent resident, it will take a LONG
> time, aka years. You might want to wait until you are able to
> naturalize before going down this path. How long would that take?
>
> ~ Jenney

Good catch, Jenney.  I assumed he meant he is a USC.

Rene
Jenney & Mark - 23 Sep 2006 23:14 GMT
> Good catch, Jenney.  I assumed he meant he is a USC.
>
> Rene

I thought so at first, too, but then it doesn't make any sense why he
would hear from people that it would take years for a US citizen to
bring their spouse from another country like Brazil. A year, maybe, but
not YEARS.

Plus I don't know why someone who is a US citizen would refer to
themselves as a US resident. I've never referred to myself as a
resident, only as a citizen, because that's what I am.

Who knows? Hopefully the OP will come back and clarify.

~ Jenney
Mark - 26 Sep 2006 00:51 GMT
Hi Guys!  Sorry for the delay.  Yes - I am a USC - if that means United States Citizen.  I am SO glad I found you because I here in Kansas!  Yes, that's right - "Dorothy and Toto."  So I am concerned about what level of quality council I am getting (with no disrespect to my attorney personally or Kansas - but more of it not really being a "metro" area).

Thanks SO much for everyone's help on this.  As you can imagine, some of these acronyms, have me confused - but I figured out USC - (I hope anyway - Ha!).  

What is a LPR?

My lawyer did discuss with me the options to bring her over on a I-29F.   But what does LPR stand for?

Here is what they are suggesting:
The plan that I am recommending is the plan where you get married in Sao Palo, your wife enters on a temporary visa, and then applies for permanent residence here in Wichita.  In order to do that, you first need to get married.  Then you file the I-130.  Once it is approved, we file the I-129F (the same form that is used for the Fiancée K-1 visa, but in this case for a Temporary Spouse K-3 visa)  With the approved I-129F, your wife obtains the temporary visa to enter the US, and then we apply for permanent residence.

The issue here is the way I understand it we will have to wait for not ONE but TWO approval's "concurrently" (independent and contingent on each other).  So, I'm doing the math and it worries me.

I had hoped that I could start on some of these forms PRIOR to the marriage - but have learned that it must be AFTER (which I guess I can understand too).

Then you hear horror stories, like a man who married a woman in the phillipines and it's taken over 4 years and she is still not in the States.  But then I read on this group that that perticular area is more difficult.

Jenney & Mark <member2595@british_expats.com> wrote:
ian-mstm - 26 Sep 2006 01:25 GMT
> Hi Guys!  Sorry for the delay.  Yes - I am a USC - if that means
> United States Citizen.  I am SO glad I found you because I here in
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via
> Encryption =----

Legal Permanent Resident (as opposed to Conditional Permanent Resident).
Both are PRs with full and equal rights/responsibilities... but a CPR
must apply to have the conditions removed.

Direct Consular Filing. Not an official term, but some countries will
allow you to file directly with the consulate rather than petitioning
in the US.

Ian
Noorah101 - 26 Sep 2006 02:22 GMT
> Hi Guys!  Sorry for the delay.  Yes - I am a USC - if that means
> United States Citizen.  I am SO glad I found you because I here in
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via
> Encryption =----

Hi Mark,

I already mentioned this, but maybe you missed it.  You don't need an
APPROVED I-130 to file the I-129F.  You only need to have the receipt
that you filed it.  So no, you are not waiting for two approvals.  You
will file the I-130, and within a few weeks you get a receipt.  Using
that receipt, you then file the I-129F.

However, lately, I-130's have sped up, so do both and just follow
through whichever one is gets an interview first.

Best Wishes,
Rene
Folinskyinla - 26 Sep 2006 02:27 GMT
> Hi Guys!  Sorry for the delay.  Yes - I am a USC - if that means
> United States Citizen.  I am SO glad I found you because I here in
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via
> Encryption =----

Hi:

LPR is "Lawful Permanent Resident" which is dervied from the term
"lawfully admitted to permanent residence."  It is old immigration-speak
-- sometimes called a "lapper."

There is a subset of LPR called "conditional permanet residence" -- this
is for marriage based immigrants when the marriage is less than two
years old and for "EB-5" investor visas.  CPR is a little confusing
becuase it is a contract term imposed 20 years back on a long
established immigration system.  A lot of things in immigration law are
depedent upon being a LPR.  So the grant of LPR based upon a marriage
less than two years old is subject to a "condition" -- you have to file
a second application at the second anniversery of grant of LPR in order
to keep it.

BTW, the "permanent" green card is valid for 10 years -- so you will see
the phrases "2 year residence" and "10-year residence" -- neither of
which is legally accurate, but I tend to be pedantic on such things.

BTW, the K-3 is only operative IF it is approved BEFORE the I-130.  I've
had case where the I-130 got approved first.

Signature

Certified Specialist
Immigration & Nat. Law
Cal. Bar Board of Legal Specialization

Jacob24 - 27 Sep 2006 03:43 GMT
> Hi Guys!  Sorry for the delay.  Yes - I am a USC - if that means
> United States Citizen.  I am SO glad I found you because I here in
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via
> Encryption =----

....
Mark - 26 Sep 2006 00:54 GMT
SORRY!  CORRECTION - THANKS - YES IT WILL BE:
MARCH 25 - 2007!  Thanks - HA!  My Bad! - Mark

Jenney & Mark <member2595@british_expats.com> wrote:
meauxna - 23 Sep 2006 23:15 GMT
> I'm not sure why your attorney told you it would take only a few
> months. Since you're only a permanent resident, it will take a LONG
> time, aka years. You might want to wait until you are able to
> naturalize before going down this path. How long would that take?
>
> ~ Jenney

Well, he didn't say he's a US PERMANENT resident, and hopefully his
lawyer isn't SO unethical as to tell him that he could petition for a
K-3 as an LPR.

I'm going with: he IS a US citizen, and he didn't know it was an
important distinction. :) If he were an LPR, he also wouldn't have used
'resident'.

Mark,
No matter what your lawyer told you, triple check it. I think that you
will find that from marriage to Brazilian wife walking over the US
border will more realistically be 9+ months based on current timelines,
and Rene's one year is realistic as well.
If your lawyer guarantees that we don't know what we're talking about,
surf yoruself over to visajourney.com and look at the average wait time
for an I-129f for a spouse--they are real reports from real people.
ian-mstm - 23 Sep 2006 23:47 GMT
> Well, he didn't say he's a US PERMANENT resident, and hopefully his
> lawyer isn't SO unethical as to tell him that he could petition for a
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> wait time for an I-129f for a spouse--they are real reports from
> real people.

I'm a bit surprised that no one else noticed that his wedding date
passed by 6 months ago! :) I suppose it's possible, in the grand
time/space scheme of things, that he's living in the past... as so many
of us do from time to time.

Ian
Jenney & Mark - 24 Sep 2006 00:20 GMT
> I'm a bit surprised that no one else noticed that his wedding date
> passed by 6 months ago! :) I suppose it's possible, in the grand
> time/space scheme of things, that he's living in the past... as so
> many of us do from time to time.
>
> Ian

Maybe he's Doctor Who! (cue the spooky theme music...) :)

~ Jenney
Noorah101 - 24 Sep 2006 00:24 GMT
> I'm a bit surprised that no one else noticed that his wedding date
> passed by 6 months ago! :) I suppose it's possible, in the grand
> time/space scheme of things, that he's living in the past... as so
> many of us do from time to time.
>
> Ian

hahaha...how funny that we read right over the typo! ;)

Rene
Folinskyinla - 24 Sep 2006 00:59 GMT
> I have been dating my girlfriend for many years and have decieded to
> ask her to marry me - which thankfully she agreed.  She lives in
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via
> Encryption =----

Hi:

I sure hope you meant March 200-SEVEN -- I know that in my court work,
the Immigration Judges are making that mistake a lot.

Please note that I did a "DCF" for Rio at the beginning of 2005.
However, direct consular filing is an ephemeral thing -- you might want
to check it out.

BTW, you might want to consider doing a civil wedding now to get the
ball rolling and then enter after the "big" public wedding.

Signature

Certified Specialist
Immigration & Nat. Law
Cal. Bar Board of Legal Specialization

meauxna - 24 Sep 2006 02:47 GMT
> Hi:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> BTW, you might want to consider doing a civil wedding now to get the
> ball rolling and then enter after the "big" public wedding.

MrF, you know I think that's an excellent idea.
Did you have to show any sort of emergency for your client to
qualify in Rio?

I won't quote you, but I might link to this thread. :)
thanks.

Mark: pay attention to both ideas!
Folinskyinla - 24 Sep 2006 04:28 GMT
> MrF, you know I think that's an excellent idea.
> Did you have to show any sort of emergency for your client to
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Mark: pay attention to both ideas!

Hi:

It was pretty straight up DCF -- however, we had to file an I-601/I-212
package upon the prompt visa refusal -- it was then sent to Lima for
adjudication.  It took about 15 months in all -- most of which was on
the waiver.

We did NOT have to show any emergency.  All I was saying was that at
that time Rio did DCF.  I have no idea if there is any change in policy.

Signature

Certified Specialist
Immigration & Nat. Law
Cal. Bar Board of Legal Specialization

couriousana - 24 Sep 2006 06:47 GMT
> Hi:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> at that time Rio did DCF.  I have no idea if there is any change
> in policy.

I'm kind of new on the immigration options and rules... but IMHO,
wouldn't it be better for Mark's fiancee to just apply for a K-1
(fiancee) visa, which would take less time than the spouse visa? He and
his wife could just have their religous ceremony in Brazil next year,
and then once having the K-1 visa she could come to US, marry and adjust
status. I have the feeling that marrying abroad is not the best option
if the couple wants to live in US afterwards. My apologies if I said
something stupid... :)
Boiler - 24 Sep 2006 07:19 GMT
> I'm kind of new on the immigration options and rules... but IMHO,
> wouldn't it be better for Mark's fiancee to just apply for a K-1
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> best option if the couple wants to live in US afterwards. My apologies
> if I said something stupid... :)

Depends if he is a USC or not.

Depends if a Religous ceremoney is legally valid in Brazil, it is in
many countries.
Noorah101 - 24 Sep 2006 07:31 GMT
> Depends if he is a USC or not.
>
> Depends if a Religous ceremoney is legally valid in Brazil, it is in
> many countries.

Yep, and also depends on if they've seen each other in person within the
past 2 years.

Rene
Jenney & Mark - 24 Sep 2006 14:58 GMT
> I'm kind of new on the immigration options and rules... but IMHO,
> wouldn't it be better for Mark's fiancee to just apply for a K-1
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> best option if the couple wants to live in US afterwards. My apologies
> if I said something stupid... :)

Not stupid at all. It's just that, like Meauxna and Rene have pointed
out, there are several details that are unknown to us which might make
the K1 impractical or impossible for the OP and his fiancee. Otherwise
it was a great suggestion. :)

~ Jenney
Mark - 24 Sep 2006 23:53 GMT
Folinskyinla <member4043@british_expats.com> wrote:

Dear, Folinskyinla - Thank YOU so much for your post... I wanted to pay you the respects immediately to acknowldege this.  I'm printing it out now and will read it.  
Folinskyinla - 25 Sep 2006 05:19 GMT
> Folinskyinla <member4043@british_expats.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via
> Encryption =----

Hi:

Remember, I'm telling you to look it up and get CURRENT information.
DCF can really be a thing that is here today and gone tomorrow in the
few posts that do it.

Signature

Certified Specialist
Immigration & Nat. Law
Cal. Bar Board of Legal Specialization

Mark - 26 Sep 2006 00:56 GMT
Can you please tell me what, DCF means?  Thanks :-)

"Mark" <mms22@swbell.net> wrote:

>----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
>http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
>----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
meauxna - 26 Sep 2006 02:55 GMT
> Can you please tell me what, DCF means?  Thanks :-)
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via
> Encryption =----

Sure, read this article:
What is DCF and Why Do I Care?
http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.php?autocom=custom&page=dcf

I can't get a bead on Rio for DCF. (DCF is NOT an official term and you
won't find it listed as such on the Consulate's webpage)
I remember MrF's story now, from when he posted. I think you'll find
things a little tighter there now, but since you will marry in Brazil
anyway, it NEVER hurts to ask, especially if you ask nicely and know the
right question. I strongly encourage you to look into this, and your
lawyer may/may not be aware of it as an option. DCF would be my #1 choice---
well, actually it WAS my #1 choice.

The K-3 visa is an optional parallel track visa for spouses. You
basically have 2 going at the same time and can take the one that is
approved first.
Either of those options will take 9-12 months.
Reread MrF's post about a civil service. No really. None of this can
start until you have a marriage certificate in hand.
Mark - 28 Sep 2006 23:51 GMT
"Mark" <mms22@swbell.net> wrote:
Thanks RENE and everyone else!  I really apprecaite it your advice and your patience! Mark
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.