NetComrade wrote on 08/25/08 12:40:
> Dear group,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> My wife might need to travel for more than 6 months.. the link says
> the person must apply for re-admission (it appears when it arrives)
> What does this really mean in practice?
It means exactly what it says.
The person shows the GC and by doing so, automatically applies for admission.
A person can only be admitted if none of the grounds of inadmissibility as
listed in INA 212 apply. Essentially, these are the same issues that the
questions on the I-485 cover (communicable disease, public charge, etc. etc.)
For stays abroad for less than 6 months, the person doesn't apply for admission,
and therefore, the grounds of inadmissibility don't apply.
To give you an example: say a person becomes unemployed, and leaves the country
for under 6 months. Such a person should not have problems returning.
However, if the same person stays abroad for over 6 months, the officer at the
POE could get the idea that the person could become a public charge (due to not
having a job and the income that comes with it) and may deny admission. Of
course, this may easily be rebuttable, e.g., if the spouse has a job.

Signature
I am not a lawyer.
For reliable advice, consult a competent immigration attorney.
NetComrade - 26 Aug 2008 19:00 GMT
On Aug 25, 10:15 pm, "Joe Feise (Immigration)" <m...@privacy.net>
wrote:
> NetComrade wrote on 08/25/08 12:40:
> It means exactly what it says.
> The person shows the GC and by doing so, automatically applies for admission.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> For stays abroad for less than 6 months, the person doesn't apply for admission,
> and therefore, the grounds of inadmissibility don't apply.
How do they know you were out of the country for over 6 months?
Joe Feise (Immigration) - 27 Aug 2008 06:23 GMT
NetComrade wrote on 08/26/08 11:00:
> On Aug 25, 10:15 pm, "Joe Feise (Immigration)" <m...@privacy.net>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> How do they know you were out of the country for over 6 months?
They know...
For example, the airlines are required by law to report their passenger
manifests, i.e., the lists of people who boarded, to DHS.
To give you an example I experienced myself: The officer said "only one week
gone" even before I had told him anything...
So, don't try to lie. It would backfire.

Signature
I am not a lawyer.
For reliable advice, consult a competent immigration attorney.
Capt. Tuttle - 27 Aug 2008 16:54 GMT
Joe Feise (Immigration) brought next idea :
> NetComrade wrote on 08/26/08 11:00:
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> gone" even before I had told him anything...
> So, don't try to lie. It would backfire.
Joe hit the nail on the head.
It is called "The Computer age".