 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsAustralia and NZCanadaUSAUSA Marriage Base ImmigrationKB.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Immigration Forum / USA / February 2010Bammer demands more money for racially segregated schools
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp- dyn/content/article/2010/02/26/AR2010022604883.html The Associated Press Friday, February 26, 2010; 5:27 PM WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama has signed an executive order strengthening the long-standing White House initiative on historically black colleges and universities. Obama says these schools have felt the pain of the recession most acutely because they enroll a higher proportion of low and middle-income students. He's calling for increased funding for historically black colleges in his proposed budget. Obama says historically black colleges and universities still play a vital role and their success is crucial to a better future for all Americans. He'll speak at the commencement ceremony for one of these institutions, Hampton University in Virginia, this spring. ----------------------------------- No president would call for increased funding for all-white schools so why for black schools? Answer - most blacks just don't have the brains to go against whites and truly need black-only schools. And all blacks know that. > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp- > dyn/content/article/2010/02/26/AR2010022604883.html [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > No president would call for increased funding for all-white schools so > why for black schools? Historically black colleges and universities don't discriminate on the basis of race. White applicants are few, e.g., about 1% of enrollees at Howard are white. > Answer - most blacks just don't have the > brains to go against whites and truly need black-only schools. And all > blacks know that. Answer - some black students would like to go to schools where they won't meet w.nkers like you. Can you blame them? >> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp- >> dyn/content/article/2010/02/26/AR2010022604883.html [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > basis of race. White applicants are few, e.g., about 1% of enrollees > at Howard are white. HAHAHA. When a white school is underrepresnted in blacks, you lib loons tout that as proof of discrimination. >>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp- >>> dyn/content/article/2010/02/26/AR2010022604883.html [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] >> the basis of race. White applicants are few, e.g., about 1% of >> enrollees at Howard are white. > HAHAHA. When a white school is underrepresnted in blacks, you lib > loons tout that as proof of discrimination. The University of Idaho has less than 1% black enrollment. That's because nobody in his right mind, let alone a black person in his right mind, wants to spend four years in Idaho. So black applications are few. Nobody claims the University of Idaho is discrminatory. Wbite enrollment at Howard is about 1%. That's because most white students don't want to spend time at a unviersity where their race is outnumbered 100 to 1. So white applications are few. Nobody claims that Howard is discriminatory. Is this too hard for you? I can type more slowly so you can follow. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2010 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.